4.1 Article

A NEW TEIID LIZARD OF THE GENUS CALLOPISTES GRAVENHORST, 1838 (SQUAMATA, TEIIDAE), FROM THE LOWER MIOCENE OF ARGENTINA

期刊

JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2018.1484754

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0132227, EF-0334961]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although squamates are commonly found in Cenozoic South American deposits, most findings correspond to fragmentary cranial materials or isolated vertebrae. Among the known South American vertebrate fossil localities, the lower section of the Chichinales Formation (Early Miocene, Colhuehuapian South American Land Mammal Age [SALMA]), in Paso Cordoba Protected Natural Area, Rio Negro Province, Argentina, recently yielded an almost complete skull of a previously unknown teiid lizard. Here, we provide a detailed description of this new fossil, based on stereoscopic and high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT scan) analyses. Our phylogenetic analysis recovered the new fossil within the monophyletic genus Callopistes, as the sister group of the fossil C. bicuspidatus from upper Miocene-lower Pliocene sediments (Montehermosan SALMA) of the Monte Hermoso Formation. The new species antedates the oldest previously known fossil record of the genus by at least 14 Ma, providing a minimum age of origin for the genus of approximately 20.1Ma (based on recent revisions of the Cenozoic fossil record of SALMA). The current distribution of the two known extant species of Callopistes and the locality from which the new taxon was recovered indicate that this genus had a much broader distribution in the past that included cis-Andean areas of Patagonia during the Miocene. Our phylogenetic results further suggest that Tupinambis uruguaianensis should be allocated to the genus Dracaena.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据