4.5 Article

Are island plant communities more invaded than their mainland counterparts?

期刊

JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 438-446

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01166.x

关键词

alien plants; Balearic Islands; community similarity; Mediterranean communities; para-oceanic islands; releve; species richness

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL2007-61165/BOS, CSD2008-00040 CGL-2009-07515, CGL2006-13421-C04-01]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [RNM-4031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Questions Are island vegetation communities more invaded than their mainland counterparts? Is this pattern consistent among community types? Location The coastal provinces of Catalonia and the para-oceanic Balearic Islands, both in NE Spain. These islands were connected to the continent more than 5.35 million years ago and are now located < 200 km from the coast. Methods We compiled a database of almost 3000 phytosociological releves from the Balearic Islands and Catalonia and compared the level of invasion by alien plants in island versus mainland communities. Twenty distinct plant community types were compared between island and mainland counterparts. Results The percentage of plots with alien species, number, percentage and cover percentage of alien species per plot was greater in Catalonia than in the Balearic Islands in most communities. Overall, across communities, more alien species were found in the mainland (53) compared to the islands (only nine). Despite these differences, patterns of the level of invasion in communities were highly consistent between the islands and mainland. The most invaded communities were ruderal and riparian. Main conclusion Our results indicate that para-oceanic island communities such as the Balearic Islands are less invaded than their mainland counterparts. This difference reflects a smaller regional alien species pool in the Balearic Islands than in the adjacent mainland, probably due to differences in landscape heterogeneity and propagule pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据