4.0 Article

Antioxidant Treatment Prevents Serum Deprivation- and TNF-α-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction through the Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase 4 and the Restoration of β-Oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 327-337

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000365926

关键词

Antioxidants; Endothelial dysfunction; Oxidative stress; beta-Oxidation; Reactive oxygen species; NADPH oxidase 4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the impaired endothelial function occurring in vascular diseases. Antioxidant strategies induce a clinical advantage in patients with endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis and protect from oxidative damage, but the underlying molecular mechanisms have been poorly evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects and mechanisms of action of antioxidant regimens on endothelial function. Methods and Results: Antioxidant efficacy of N-acetylcysteine, ascorbic acid and propionyl-L-carnitine was evaluated in serum-deprived and TNF-alpha-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro. Cell adhesion molecule (CAM) expression was evaluated by blot and real-time PCR, and inflammatory cytokine secretion was evaluated by ELISA; leukocyte adhesion and reactive oxygen species assays and NADPH oxidase 4 isoform (Nox4) expression analyses by blots were also performed. Antioxidant pretreatment restored serum-deprived and TNF-alpha-induced impaired mitochondrial beta-oxidation by reducing flavin adenine dinucleotide level and counteract-ing increased CAM and Nox4 expression, leukocyte adhesion and inflammatory cytokine secretion. Specific inhibition by plumbagin and siNox4 prevented TNF-alpha- and serum deprivation-induced detrimental effects, confirming that endothelial oxidative stress and inflammation were Nox4 dependent. Conclusions: Our findings documented Nox4 as a main actor in oxidative stress-induced endothelial dysfunction and further clarify the molecular basis of antioxidant treatment efficacy. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据