4.8 Article

Identification of a triplet pair intermediate in singlet exciton fission in solution

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503471112

关键词

singlet fission; photochemistry; TIPS-tetracene; triplet; excimer

资金

  1. Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1255494] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1255494] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/T11630/01, EP/K025651/1, GR/T06568/01, EP/M005143/1, EP/G060738/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/M005143/1, EP/K025651/1, EP/G060738/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Singlet exciton fission is the spin-conserving transformation of one spin-singlet exciton into two spin-triplet excitons. This exciton multiplication mechanism offers an attractive route to solar cells that circumvent the single-junction Shockley-Queisser limit. Most theoretical descriptions of singlet fission invoke an intermediate state of a pair of spin-triplet excitons coupled into an overall spin-singlet configuration, but such a state has never been optically observed. In solution, we show that the dynamics of fission are diffusion limited and enable the isolation of an intermediate species. In concentrated solutions of bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)[TIPS]tetracene we find rapid (<100 ps) formation of excimers and a slower (similar to 10 ns) break up of the excimer to two triplet exciton-bearing free molecules. These excimers are spectroscopically distinct from singlet and triplet excitons, yet possess both singlet and triplet characteristics, enabling identification as a triplet pair state. We find that this triplet pair state is significantly stabilized relative to free triplet excitons, and that it plays a critical role in the efficient endothermic singlet fission process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据