4.6 Article

Long-Term Efficacy and Durability of Botulinum-A Toxin for Refractory Dysfunctional Voiding in Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 191, 期 5, 页码 1586-1591

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.034

关键词

urethra; botulinum toxins, type A; urinary incontinence; urinary tract infections; urination disorders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We evaluated our long-term experience with intrasphincteric botulinum toxin A injection in children with dysfunctional voiding. Materials and Methods: From January 2006 through July 2012 we saw 2,172 neurologically normal children due to dysfunctional voiding. Of patients who presented to these visits we retrospectively identified the charts of 12 with dysfunctional voiding (8 females) in whom urotherapy and medical management failed and who underwent botulinum toxin A injection to the external urinary sphincter. Mean patient age at surgery was 10.5 years (range 4 to 19). Average followup was 45 months (range 20 to 71). Preoperatively and postoperatively all children were evaluated with history and physical examination, voiding diary, renal and pelvic ultrasound with post-void residual volume measurement and uroflowmetry. Results: Eight of the 12 children (67%) experienced significant improvement in voiding parameters. Before vs after treatment mean +/- SD post-void residual urine volume was 115 +/- 83 vs 57 +/- 61 ml (p = 0.016) and the mean maximum flow rate was 11.8 +/- 8.1 vs 20.4 +/- 7.9 ml per second. Half of the cohort required a second injection an average of 15 months later. Three of the 4 patients who failed to show improvement had neuropsychiatric problems and 1 had evidence of bladder underactivity. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate reasonable efficacy and durability of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin A injection in children with refractory dysfunctional voiding. Neuropsychiatric issues appear to negatively influence the success rate. Long-term followup is vital to identify patients in whom repeat injection may be necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据