4.6 Article

Progressive Vascular Damage May Lead to Bladder Underactivity in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 191, 期 5, 页码 1462-1469

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.097

关键词

urinary bladder; lower urinary tract symptoms; arterial occlusive diseases; ischemia; pelvis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We assessed whether progressive vascular damage causes bladder underactivity in rats. Materials and Methods: Adult male Sprague Dawley (R) rats were divided into 4 groups. Controls received a regular diet and tap water. The L-NAME group received a 2% cholesterol diet and L-NAME (3 mg/ml) dissolved in drinking water. The arterial injury group underwent balloon endothelial injury of the common iliac arteries and received a 2% cholesterol diet and tap water after injury. The arterial injury/L-NAME group also received L-NAME dissolved in drinking water. At 8 weeks urodynamics were performed, bladder tissue was harvested for pharmacological studies, and the iliac arteries and bladders were histologically examined. Results: Iliac arteries from the injury and injury/L-NAME groups showed neointimal formation and luminal occlusion but arteries from the L-NAME group did not. In theL-NAMEand injury groups bladder capacity and voided volume were less than in controls. Conversely, in the injury/L-NAME group these cystometric parameters were significantly greater than in the other groups. Post-void residual volume in the injury/L-NAME group tended to increase compared with the other groups. Contractile responses of bladder strips to various stimuli in the L-NAME, injury and injury/L-NAME groups were significantly less than in controls and the lowest in the injury/L-NAME group. The injury and injury/L-NAME groups showed a significantly increased percent of collagen compared to controls. Conclusions: Pelvic arterial occlusive disease plus vascular endothelial dysfunction may cause progressive vascular damage resulting in bladder dysfunction that develops from bladder hyperactivity to bladder underactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据