4.8 Article

Fatigue-free, superstretchable, transparent, and biocompatible metal electrodes

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516873112

关键词

fatigue-free; adhesion; biocompatibility; topology; stretchability

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DOE DE-SC0010831/DE-FG02-13ER46917]
  2. Harvard University
  3. National Science Foundation under Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR 14-20570]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01CA155069]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372855]
  6. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-09-1-0656]
  7. T. L. L. Temple Foundation
  8. John J. and Rebecca Moores Endowment
  9. State of Texas through Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Next-generation flexible electronics require highly stretchable and transparent electrodes. Few electronic conductors are both transparent and stretchable, and even fewer can be cyclically stretched to a large strain without causing fatigue. Fatigue, which is often an issue of strained materials causing failure at low strain levels of cyclic loading, is detrimental to materials under repeated loads in practical applications. Here we show that optimizing topology and/or tuning adhesion of metal nanomeshes can significantly improve stretchability and eliminate strain fatigue. The ligaments in an Au nanomesh on a slippery substrate can locally shift to relax stress upon stretching and return to the original configurationwhen stress is removed. The Au nanomesh keeps a low sheet resistance and high transparency, comparable to those of strain-free indium tin oxide films, when the nanomesh is stretched to a strain of 300%, or shows no fatigue after 50,000 stretches to a strain up to 150%. Moreover, the Au nanomesh is biocompatible and penetrable to biomacromolecules in fluid. The superstretchable transparent conductors are highly desirable for stretchable photoelectronics, electronic skins, and implantable electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据