4.8 Article

Galactose metabolic genes in yeast respond to a ratio of galactose and glucose

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418058112

关键词

nutrient signaling; signal integration; gene regulation; ratio sensing; yeast

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1349248]
  3. Fundacion Mexico at Harvard
  4. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT)
  5. Department of Defense [W911NF-12-1-0390]
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1349248] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural environments are filled with multiple, often competing, signals. In contrast, biological systems are often studied in well-controlled environments where only a single input is varied, potentially missing important interactions between signals. Catabolite repression of galactose by glucose is one of the best-studied eukaryotic signal integration systems. In this system, it is believed that galactose metabolic (GAL) genes are induced only when glucose levels drop below a threshold. In contrast, we show that GAL gene induction occurs at a constant external galactose: glucose ratio across a wide range of sugar concentrations. We systematically perturbed the components of the canonical galactose/glucose signaling pathways and found that these components do not account for ratio sensing. Instead we provide evidence that ratio sensing occurs upstream of the canonical signaling pathway and results from the competitive binding of the two sugars to hexose transporters. We show that a mutant that behaves as the classical model expects (i.e., cannot use galactose above a glucose threshold) has a fitness disadvantage compared with wild type. A number of common biological signaling motifs can give rise to ratio sensing, typically through negative interactions between opposing signaling molecules. We therefore suspect that this previously unidentified nutrient sensing paradigm may be common and overlooked in biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据