4.6 Article

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intralesional Verapamil Versus Normal Saline Injection in a Novel Peyronie Disease Animal Model: Assessment of Immunohistopathological Changes and Erectile Function Outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 189, 期 1, 页码 380-384

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.191

关键词

penis; penile induration; penile erection; verapamil; smooth muscle actin, rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: While intralesional injections improve penile curvature and decrease plaque volume, the exact mechanism of action on Peyronie disease is unknown. We evaluated penile curvature, immunohistology and erectile function outcomes after intralesional injections of verapamil and normal saline in a previously described Peyronie disease animal model. Materials and Methods: Peyronie plaque was induced in 12 adult male rats using an established Peyronie disease animal model. At 4 weeks the rats were divided into group 1-5 with 0.1 mg/0.1 ml intralesional verapamil injected every second day for 2 weeks, group 2-5 with 0.1 ml intralesional normal saline injection and group 3-2 that served as controls. At weeks 6 and 8 penile pressure was measured and serial immunohistochemical staining of penile tissue sections was done. Results: Intralesional injection of verapamil and normal saline resulted in macroscopic and microscopic changes to penile curvature and Peyronie plaque size. Decreased collagen and elastin fibers were measured with a significant reduction in smooth muscle alpha-actin (p < 0.05). Changes were greater in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.05). Intralesional verapamil injection was associated with greater recovery of electrostimulated penile pressure, a surrogate of erectile function, than in the saline and control groups. Conclusions: To our knowledge this novel study offers for the first time histological evidence of cellular changes and improvement in penile pressure studies in rats with Peyronie plaque after intralesional verapamil injection therapy in a Peyronie disease animal model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据