4.8 Article

PopZ identifies the new pole, and PodJ identifies the old pole during polar growth in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515544112

关键词

Agrobacterium cell cycle; PopZ; PodJ; polar growth; bacterial cell division

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1243360]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1S0OD018136-01]
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1243360] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agrobacterium tumefaciens elongates by addition of peptidoglycan (PG) only at the pole created by cell division, the growth pole, whereas the opposite pole, the old pole, is inactive for PG synthesis. How Agrobacterium assigns and maintains pole asymmetry is not understood. Here, we investigated whether polar growth is correlated with novel pole-specific localization of proteins implicated in a variety of growth and cell division pathways. The cell cycle of A. tumefaciens was monitored by time-lapse and super-resolution microscopy to image the localization of A. tumefaciens homologs of proteins involved in cell division, PG synthesis and pole identity. FtsZ and FtsA accumulate at the growth pole during elongation, and improved imaging reveals FtsZ disappears from the growth pole and accumulates at the midcell before FtsA. The L, D-transpeptidase Atu0845 was detected mainly at the growth pole. A. tumefaciens specific pole-organizing protein (Pop) PopZ(At) and polar organelle development (Pod) protein PodJ(At) exhibited dynamic yet distinct behavior. PopZ(At) was found exclusively at the growing pole and quickly switches to the new growth poles of both siblings immediately after septation. PodJ(At) is initially at the old pole but then also accumulates at the growth pole as the cell cycle progresses suggesting that PodJ(At) may mediate the transition of the growth pole to an old pole. Thus, PopZ(At) is a marker for growth pole identity, whereas PodJAt identifies the old pole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据