4.8 Article

Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510459112

关键词

environmental neuroscience; nature experience; rumination; psychological ecosystem services; emotion regulation

资金

  1. Winslow Foundation
  2. George Rudolf Fellowship Fund
  3. Victoria and David Rogers Fund
  4. Mr. & Mrs. Dean A. McGee Fund
  5. Stanford Center for Cognitive and Neurobiological Imaging
  6. EIPER
  7. Stanford Graduate Fellowship Program in Science and Engineering
  8. Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urbanization has many benefits, but it also is associated with increased levels of mental illness, including depression. It has been suggested that decreased nature experience may help to explain the link between urbanization and mental illness. This suggestion is supported by a growing body of correlational and experimental evidence, which raises a further question: what mechanism(s) link decreased nature experience to the development of mental illness? One such mechanism might be the impact of nature exposure on rumination, a maladaptive pattern of self-referential thought that is associated with heightened risk for depression and other mental illnesses. We show in healthy participants that a brief nature experience, a 90-min walk in a natural setting, decreases both self-reported rumination and neural activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC), whereas a 90-min walk in an urban setting has no such effects on self-reported rumination or neural activity. In other studies, the sgPFC has been associated with a self-focused behavioral withdrawal linked to rumination in both depressed and healthy individuals. This study reveals a pathway by which nature experience may improve mental well-being and suggests that accessible natural areas within urban contexts may be a critical resource for mental health in our rapidly urbanizing world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据