4.6 Article

The Immunocytokine F8-IL2 Improves the Therapeutic Performance of Sunitinib in a Mouse Model of Renal Cell Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 184, 期 6, 页码 2540-2548

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.07.030

关键词

extracellular matrix proteins; carcinoma; renal cell; cytokines; F8 monoclonal antibody; sunitinib

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. ETH Zurich
  3. European Union
  4. Swiss Cancer League
  5. Swiss-Bridge Foundation
  6. Stammbach Foundation
  7. Italian Association for Cancer Research
  8. Fondazione Cariplo [2008-2264]
  9. Pfizer Germany
  10. Bayer
  11. Novartis Germany
  12. Wyeth Germany
  13. Roche Germany
  14. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We investigated the therapeutic action of F8-IL2, a fusion protein consisting of the F8 antibody specific to the alternatively spliced extradomain-A of fibronectin, in diabody format and of human interleukin-2 in the Caki-1 (ATCC (R)) model of human renal cell carcinoma grafted subcutaneously in nude mice. Materials and Methods: F8-IL2 was cloned, expressed in CHO cells and purified to homogeneity. This immunocytokine was administered alone or combined with 3 standard drugs commonly used as therapy for kidney cancer, including sunitinib, sorafenib and interferon-alpha, in 2 sets of doses and treatment schedules. Results: Neither F8-IL2 nor any other therapeutic agent cured tumor bearing mice when used as a single agent. The best therapeutic results were observed for the combination of sunitinib with F8-IL2 in a continuous administration schedule, which yielded a 28% cure rate and substantial tumor growth retardation. Conclusions: Considering that recombinant interleukin-2 based immunocytokines are now being investigated in several clinical trials in patients with cancer alone or combined with chemotherapy our preclinical results provide a motivation to study F8-IL2 combined with sunitinib in clinical trials in patients with kidney cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据