4.6 Article

Low Frequency of Epigenetic Events in Urothelial Tumors in Young Patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 184, 期 2, 页码 459-463

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.131

关键词

urinary bladder; carcinoma; urothelium; age groups; methylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Bladder urothelial cell carcinoma is uncommon in young patients. We recently reported a series of tumors in patients younger than 20 years at diagnosis and performed exhaustive genetic screening for molecular alterations. Few events typical of bladder urothelial cell carcinoma were detected. Since many carcinogenic events occur at the epigenetic rather than the genetic level, we analyzed the same tumors for alterations in DNA hypermethylation. We compared our findings with those in tumors in older patients with similar pathological profiles. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 76 bladder urothelial cell carcinomas from 3 groups stratified by age at diagnosis, including less than 19, 20 to 45 and greater than 46 years (median 78), and matched for low grade and nonmuscle invasive stage. We used quantified methyl specific polymerase chain reaction to investigate promoter methylation for 8 tumor suppressor genes implicated in urothelial carcinogenesis. Results: Tumors in the youngest age group had the lowest incidence of global hypermethylation compared to the other tumors with a methyl index of 37.5% vs 62.5% and 50%, respectively (ANOVA p = 0.009). When individual loci were analyzed, younger patients had a significantly lower rate and concentration of methylation at APC, Bc12, MGMT and E-cadherin promoters than in the older groups (p <0.05). Few differences were present between the 2 older cohorts but the APC and MGMT methylation concentration increased with age. Conclusions: Urothelial tumors in patients younger than 19 years have a low rate of epigenetic alteration. Tumors in patients older than 20 years have epigenetic profiles similar to those of tumors in patients within the typical bladder urothelial cell carcinoma age range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据