4.8 Article

Quantitative regulation of FLC via coordinated transcriptional initiation and elongation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518369112

关键词

chromatin; COOLAIR; autonomous pathway; FCA; alternative polyadenylation

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/K007203/1]
  2. BBSRC Institute Strategic Program GRO [BB/J004588/1]
  3. VSBfonds Scholarship
  4. Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds Scholarship
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000CA447, BB/K007203/1, BBS/E/J/000C0637] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1099861, BBS/E/J/000C0637, BB/K007203/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basis of quantitative regulation of gene expression is still poorly understood. In Arabidopsis thaliana, quantitative variation in expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) influences the timing of flowering. In ambient temperatures, FLC expression is quantitatively modulated by a chromatin silencing mechanism involving alternative polyadenylation of antisense transcripts. Investigation of this mechanism unexpectedly showed that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy changes at FLC did not reflect RNA fold changes. Mathematical modeling of these transcriptional dynamics predicted a tight coordination of transcriptional initiation and elongation. This prediction was validated by detailed measurements of total and chromatin-bound FLC intronic RNA, a methodology appropriate for analyzing elongation rate changes in a range of organisms. Transcription initiation was found to vary similar to 25-fold with elongation rate varying similar to 8- to 12-fold. Premature sense transcript termination contributed very little to expression differences. This quantitative variation in transcription was coincident with variation in H3K36me3 and H3K4me2 over the FLC gene body. We propose different chromatin states coordinately influence transcriptional initiation and elongation rates and that this coordination is likely to be a general feature of quantitative gene regulation in a chromatin context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据