4.2 Article

A subgrid model for clustering of high-inertia particles in large-eddy simulations of turbulence

期刊

JOURNAL OF TURBULENCE
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 366-385

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2014.909600

关键词

large-eddy simulation; subgrid model; kinematic simulation; inertial particle; turbulence

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET 0756510, CBET 0967349, OCI-1053575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clustering (or preferential concentration) of inertial particles suspended in a homogeneous, isotropic turbulent flow is strongly influenced by the smallest scales of the turbulence. In particle-laden large-eddy simulations (LES) of turbulence, these small scales are not captured by the grid and hence their effect on particle motion needs to be modelled. In this paper, we use a subgrid model based on kinematic simulations of turbulence (Kinematic Simulation based SubGrid Model or KSSGM), for the first time in the context of predicting the clustering and the relative velocity statistics of inertial particles. This initial study focuses on the special case of inertial particles in the absence of gravitational settling. We show that the KSSGM gives excellent predictions for clustering in a priori tests for inertial particles with St >= 2.0, where St is the Stokes number, defined as the ratio of the particle response time to the Kolmogorov time-scale. To the best of our knowledge, the KSSGM represents the first model that has been shown to capture the effect of the subgrid scales on inertial particle clustering for St >= 2.0. We also show that the mean inward radial relative velocity between inertial particles (⟨w(r)⟩((-)), which enters into the formula for the collision kernel) is accurately predicted by the KSSGM for all St. We explain why the model captures clustering at higher St but not for lower St , and provide new insights into the key statistical parameters of turbulence that a subgrid model would have to describe, in order to accurately predict clustering of low-St particles in an LES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据