4.2 Article

Use of a novel abdominal aortic tourniquet to reduce or eliminate flow in the common femoral artery in human subjects

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 S103-S105

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182606219

关键词

Hemorrhage; abdominal tourniquet; junctional hemorrhage; combat casualty care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Penetrating injuries of proximal femoral and iliac vessels are a common cause of death on the battlefield. Previous studies have shown that by applying 80 lb to 140 lb of pressure externally over the distal abdominal aorta, flow can be ceased in the common femoral artery (CFA). It has also been demonstrated that in a porcine model, an externally applied pneumatic abdominal aortic tourniquet (AAT) can occlude the aorta and inferior vena cava for 60 minutes without bowel injury or significant potassium elevations. The objectives of this study were (1) determine if AAT use in humans results in flow cessation in the CFA, (2) measure the pressure required to cease flow in the CFA, and (3) measure discomfort associated with application of the AAT. METHODS: Pulse wave Doppler measurements were taken in supine volunteers at the right CFA. The AAT was placed just above the iliac crests over the anterior abdomen. The AAT was inflated using a hand pump with an integrated manometer. Measurements were taken every 30 mm Hg. Discomfort was measured using a 10-point pain scale. RESULTS: In all subjects, flow was reduced in the CFA. Flow ceased in seven of nine subjects at a median pressure of 180 mm Hg (150-230 mm Hg). Median discomfort at ceasing of flow was 7 (3-10), returning to 0 after device removal. CONCLUSION: The AAT device was effective at reducing flow in the CFA and ceased flow in most of the subjects. Application of the device was associated with discomfort varying from moderate to severe and resolving with device removal. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: S103-S105. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据