4.2 Article

Inhaled epoprostenol improves oxygenation in severe hypoxemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 503-506

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318258431e

关键词

Inhaled prostacyclin; ARDS; hypoxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Epoprostenol (Flolan), an inhalational epoprostenol vasodilator, increases pulmonary arterial flow and decreases pulmonary pressures, thereby improving gas exchange and arterial oxygenation. We evaluated the benefits of inhaled epoprostenol as a less expensive alternative to nitric oxide in ventilated surgical intensive care patients with severe hypoxemia. METHODS: After institutional review board approval was obtained, the records of mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients who received epoprostenol as a therapy for severe hypoxia (SaO(2) < 90%) in a tertiary care referral center were retrospectively reviewed. Initial PaO2/FIO2 (P/F) ratio and oxygen saturation were compared with values at 12 and 48 hours after the administration of epoprostenol. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance compared improvements in oxygenation. Further subgroup analyses evaluated differences among trauma, nontrauma patient subgroups, time to initiation of epoprostenol, and age. RESULTS: During a 20 month-interval beginning February 2009, 36 patients (23 trauma and 13 nontrauma; age, 15-80 years) were treated. Epoprostenol significantly improved both P/F ratio and oxygen saturation in both trauma and nontrauma patients. There was no difference between subgroups. Larger improvements in P/F ratio were seen when epoprostenol was started within 7 days. Response between age groups did not differ significantly. Subgroup analysis of mortality (trauma, 60.9% vs. nontrauma, 61.5%) failed to show any differences. CONCLUSION: Treatment with inhaled epoprostenol improved gas exchange in severely hypoxemic surgical patients. Earlier intervention (within 7 days of intubation) was more efficacious at improving oxygenation. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 503-506. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据