4.7 Article

Evaluation of a multi-marker immunomagnetic enrichment assay for the quantification of circulating melanoma cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-192

关键词

Circulating tumour cells; Melanoma; Immunomagnetic enrichment; Multi-marker

资金

  1. Ziman, NHMRC [1013349]
  2. Cancer and Palliative Care Research and Evaluation Unit WAPCN Small Grants
  3. Cancer Council of WA Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) are thought to be valuable in improving measures of prognosis in melanoma patients and may be a useful marker of residual disease to identify non-metastatic patients requiring adjuvant therapy. We investigated whether immunomagnetic enrichment targeting multiple markers allows more efficient enrichment of CMCs from patient peripheral blood than targeting a single marker. Furthermore, we aimed to determine whether the number of CMCs in patient blood was associated with disease stage. Methods: We captured CMCs by targeting the melanoma associated markers MCSP and MCAM as well as the melanoma stem cell markers ABCB5 and CD271, both individually and in combination, by immunomagnetic enrichment. CMCs were enriched and quantified from the peripheral blood of 10 non-metastatic and 13 metastatic melanoma patients. Results: Targeting all markers in combination resulted in the enrichment of more CMCs than when any individual marker was targeted (p < 0.001-0.028). Furthermore, when a combination of markers was targeted, a greater number of CMCs were enriched in metastatic patients compared with non-metastatic patients (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that a combination of markers should be targeted for optimal isolation of CMCs. In addition, there are significantly more CMCs in metastatic patients compared with non-metastatic patients and therefore quantification of CMCs may prove to be a useful marker of disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据