4.1 Article

Microarray and Gene Ontology analyses reveal downregulation of DNA repair and apoptotic pathways in diethylstilbestrol-exposed testicular Leydig cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 287-295

出版社

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.37.287

关键词

Leydig cells; Diethylstilbestrol; 17 beta-estradiol; Gene Ontology; DNA repair; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [19890144, 21791037]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19890144, 21791037, 23390386] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the deleterious effects of the synthetic non-steroidal estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) on testicular Leydig cells and compared these effects with those of the natural estrogen 17 beta-estradiol (E2). For that purpose, we performed microarray analysis of a mouse Leydig cell line (TTE1) treated with these estrogens, followed by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and parametric analysis of gene set enrichment (PAGE). Most notably, GO analysis revealed a significant decrease in the biological processes of the GO categories DNA repair and apoptotic program in DES-exposed cells. PAGE showed that cell death, which is a superior GO category including apoptosis in the GO tree structure, significantly decreased in DES-exposed cells but significantly increased in E2-exposed cells. Interestingly, only 2 genes (Tia1 and Gas1) with altered expression patterns in the cell death category were common between DES- and E2-treated cells. The downregulation of apoptotic cell death pathways and DNA repair capability of DES-exposed cells implies that DES promotes carcinogenic processes more strongly than E2 does. These findings suggest that molecular events that occur following DES and E2 treatments differ substantially in Leydig cells, and that the effects of synthetic estrogen and natural estrogen differ more substantially than previously suspected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据