4.5 Article

Hybrid PGS-PCL microfibrous scaffolds with improved mechanical and biological properties

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/term.313

关键词

poly(glycerol sebacate); elastomer; fibres; electrospinning; polycaprolactone; tissue engineering

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB007249, DE019024, HL092836]
  2. US Army Corps of Engineers
  3. NSF
  4. Fonds de Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT), Quebec, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) is a biodegradable elastomer that has generated great interest as a scaffold material due to its desirable mechanical properties. However, the use of PGS in tissue engineering is limited by difficulties in casting micro- and nanofibrous structures, due to high temperatures and vacuum required for its curing and limited solubility of the cured polymer. In this paper, we developed microfibrous scaffolds made from blends of PGS and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) using a standard electrospinning set-up. At a given PGS : PCL ratio, higher voltage resulted in significantly smaller fibre diameters (reduced from similar to 4 mu m to 2.8 mu m; p < 0.05). Further increase in voltage resulted in the fusion of fibres. Similarly, higher PGS concentrations in the polymer blend resulted in significantly increased fibre diameter (p < 0.01). We further compared the mechanical properties of electrospun PGS : PCL scaffolds with those made from PCL. Scaffolds with higher PGS concentrations showed higher elastic modulus (EM), ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and ultimate elongation (UE) (p < 0.01) without the need for thermal curing or photocrosslinking. Biological evaluation of these scaffolds showed significantly improved HUVEC attachment and proliferation compared to PCL-only scaffolds (p < 0.05). Thus, we have demonstrated that simple blends of PGS prepolymer with PCL can be used to fabricate microfibrous scaffolds with mechanical properties in the range of a human aortic valve leaflet. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据