4.5 Article

Biomimetic method for combining the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus for intervertebral disc tissue engineering

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.412

关键词

intervertebral disc; tissue engineering; biomimetic; electrospinning; annulus fibrosus; nucleus pulposus

资金

  1. University of Kansas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineering strategies for the intervertebral disc (IVD) have traditionally focused either on the annulus fibrosus (AF) or the nucleus pulposus (NP) in isolation, or have simply compared AF cells and NP cells in identical culture conditions. Recently, others in the field have become aware of the advantage of combining the AF and NP into a more comprehensive strategy to address IVD tissue engineering, and have introduced biomimetic approaches to either AF or NP tissue engineering. Here, we introduced a new method for developing a biomimetic, cell-seeded IVD by electrospinning circumferentially-orientated polycaprolactone fibres (AF analogue), seeding them with cells (porcine chondrocytes) and then gelling a cell-agarose solution in the centre (NP analogue). Scanning electron microscopy images demonstrated a high degree of fibre alignment and, along with fluorescent actin staining, confirmed a preferred orientation of cells in the direction of the fibres. Viability assays and histology collectively demonstrated that cells were viable and well-distributed around the interface between the NP and AF regions. In addition, mechanical testing confirmed that the composite IVD scaffolds had higher moduli than the agarose hydrogels alone. As we enter the new decade and the fields of AF and NP tissue engineering begin to merge into a new interfacial and functional IVD tissue-engineering field, approaches such as the method presented here will serve as the foundation for continuously advancing technology that we ultimately endeavour to bring to the clinic for the treatment of patients severely afflicted by degenerative disc disease. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据