4.6 Article

A novel conditional platelet depletion mouse model reveals the importance of platelets in protection against Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 303-313

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12795

关键词

bacteria; blood platelets; sepsis; septic shock; Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. NIH [HL122401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPlatelets are critical cells for maintaining vascular hemostasis, but their activities in other processes are becoming apparent. Specifically, the ability of platelets to recognize and respond to infectious agents is an important area of investigation. To understand the physiologic roles of platelets invivo, most researchers have used antibody-mediated platelet depletion, which has certain limitations. ObjectiveTo develop an optimal system with which to study the contribution of platelets to protection against S.aureus blood infection. MethodsHere, we describe a novel experimental model of conditional platelet depletion based on the Cre-recombinase cell ablation system. With this technology, the simian diphtheria toxin receptor was expressed in platelet factor4-positive cells (megakaryocytes and platelets). ResultsSystemic administration of diphtheria toxin every 48h resulted in reduced platelet numbers that became undetectable after 6days. Although platelets were depleted, no other blood cells were affected. With this newly developed model, the functional contributions of platelets to protection against Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was examined. Platelet-depleted mice succumbed to infection more rapidly than wild-type mice, and had a significantly higher bacterial burden in kidneys, elevated levels of serum markers of kidney damage, and increased levels of cytokines indicative of septic shock. ConclusionsHere, we illustrate a new mouse model for conditional platelet depletion, and implicate platelets as important participants in the immune response to bacterial blood infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据