4.6 Review

Thrombotic complications of myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk assessment and risk-guided management

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1215-1227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12265

关键词

leukocytosis; myeloproliferative disorders; polycythemia; thrombocytosis; thrombosis

资金

  1. Dr Henri Dubois-Ferriere Dinu Lipatti Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are considered to be acquired thrombophilic states. Thromboses, both arterial and venous (not rarely in unusual sites), are often the initial events leading to the diagnosis. After diagnosis, the yearly incidence of thrombotic events is highly variable, and ranges from approximately 1% to 10%. The identification of patients at risk who may benefit from antithrombotic therapy remains a challenge, and it is currently based on age and history of thrombotic events. However, the predictive value of these clinical characteristics is rather limited. Few prospective studies and even fewer interventional randomized studies are available, and there are no studies designed to formally validate the use of risk stratification. The implementation of laboratory parameters such as leukocytosis and/or the JAK2 V617F mutation into a scoring system may be of interest. The mechanisms at work leading to thrombosis remain largely speculative, but are likely to be complex and multifactorial, with a prominent role of cell-cell interactions, mostly owing to qualitative changes. The long-term treatment options to prevent thrombosis are, schematically, aspirin alone as primary prevention for the low-risk patients, and cytoreduction combined with aspirin for the other patients. In very low-risk young essential thrombocythemia patients, abstention can even be considered. The optimal duration of anticoagulation after a thrombotic event is not established. All antithrombotic therapies should be balanced with the hemorrhagic risk, which can also be increased in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据