4.6 Article

Musculoskeletal health of subjects with hemophilia A treated with tailored prophylaxis: Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis (CHPS) Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 460-466

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12113

关键词

hemarthrosis; hemophilia; joint; prophylaxis

资金

  1. Canadian Blood Services/Hema Quebec Partnership Fund
  2. MRC/PMAC or Industry (Bayer) Fund
  3. Bayer, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Full-dose prophylaxis is very effective at minimizing joint damage but is costly. Tailored prophylaxis has been proposed as a way of reducing costs while still protecting joints. Objective To report detailed findings in index joints of 56 subjects with severe hemophilia A entered into the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study, and treated with tailored prophylaxis, after 13years. Methods Boys with severe hemophilia A (<2% factor) and normal joints were enrolled between the ages of 1 and 2.5years. Initial treatment consisted of once-weekly factor infusions, with the frequency escalating in a stepwise fashion when breakthrough bleeding occurred. During the first 5years, subjects were examined every 3months using the modified Colorado Physical Evaluation (PE) scale; subsequently, every 6months. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) was administered at each visit. Results Median age at study entry was 19months (range 1230months); median follow-up was 92months (range 2156). The median PE score was 2, 3 and 3 at ages 3, 6 and 10years. Persistent findings were related to swelling, muscle atrophy and loss of range of motion. The median score for each of these items (for the six index joints) was 0 at ages 3, 6 and 10years. The median overall CHAQ score was 0 at ages 3, 6 and 10years, indicating excellent function. Conclusions Canadian boys treated with tailored primary prophylaxis exhibit minimal joint change on physical examination and minimal functional disability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据