4.6 Article

Effects of rivaroxaban, acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel as monotherapy and in combination in a porcine model of stent thrombosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 2470-2480

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12033

关键词

aspirin; clopidogrel; rivaroxaban; stent thrombosis

资金

  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel), there is a = 1.4% incidence of in-stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Factor Xa inhibitors are being investigated for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome. Objective: To study the antithrombotic effects of the FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban alone or in combination with DAT. Methods: Bare metal stents (12 per animal, three per intervention period) were deployed in a porcine ex vivo arteriovenous shunt and exposed to flowing arterial blood (shear rate: 1500 s-1). In-stent thrombus formation was analyzed under different treatments: vehicle (n = 7 animals); intravenous (i.v.) rivaroxaban (0.11, 0.33, and 1.0 mu g kg1 min-1) (n = 8); rivaroxaban + ASA (1.0 mg kg-1 i.v.) (n = 6); rivaroxaban + ASA (1.0 mg kg-1 i.v.) + clopidogrel (0.5 mg kg-1 i.v.) (n = 7); and ASA (1.0 mg kg-1 i.v.) + clopidogrel (0.5 mg kg-1 i.v.) (n = 6). Results: Rivaroxaban dose-dependently reduced stent thrombus weight by = 66% vs. vehicle (P < 0.05, all doses). Rivaroxaban + ASA further reduced thrombus weight vs. vehicle (86% at the highest rivaroxaban dose; P < 0.001). DAT reduced thrombus weight by = 79%. However, rivaroxaban + ASA + clopidogrel almost completely abolished in-stent thrombus formation (98% reduction vs. vehicle at the highest rivaroxaban dose; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data on the inhibitory effect of rivaroxaban alone or with DAT are consistent with the ATLAS 2 trial findings, and support its potential use for preventing stent thrombosis after stent deployment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据