4.6 Article

Validation of Nijmegen-Bethesda assay modifications to allow inhibitor measurement during replacement therapy and facilitate inhibitor surveillance

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 1055-1061

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04705.x

关键词

factor IX; factor VIII; inhibitor

资金

  1. CDC Foundation through Pfizer Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: As part of a pilot U.S. inhibitor surveillance project initiated at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2006, a centralized inhibitor measurement was instituted. Objective: To validate a modified method for inhibitor measurement suitable for surveillance of treated and untreated patients. Methods/Results: In all, 710 subjects with hemophilia A were enrolled; 122 had a history of inhibitor (HI). Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) results on 50 split specimens shipped on cold packs and frozen were equivalent (r = 0.998). Because 55% of 228 initial specimens had factor (F) VIII activity (VIII: C) present, a heat treatment step was added. Heating specimens to 56 degrees C for 30 min and centrifuging removed FVIII, as demonstrated by a reduction of VIII: C and FVIII antigen to < 1 U dL(-1) in recently treated patients. Among specimens inhibitor-negative before heating, one of 159 with negative HI and five of 30 with positive HI rose to >= 0.5 Nijmegen-Bethesda units (NBU) after heating. Correlation of heated and unheated inhibitor-positive specimens was 0.94 (P = 0.0001). The modified method had a coefficient of variation (CV) for a 1 NBU positive control of 10.3% and for the negative control of 9.8%. Based on results on 710 enrollment specimens, a positive CDC inhibitor was defined as >= 0.5 NBU. Results were similar when 643 post-enrollment specimens were included. Of 160 enrolled hemophilia B patients, two had HI. All others had NBU <= 0.2 at enrollment. Conclusion: The CDC experience demonstrates that this modified NBA can be standardized to be within acceptable limits for clinical tests and can be used for national surveillance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据