4.4 Article

Axial dynamic characteristic parameters identification of rolling joints in a ball screw feed drive system

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954406215597955

关键词

Ball screw feed drive system; mechanical joints; dynamic characteristic parameter identification; mechanical vibration; genetic algorithm

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50975179]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [11ZZ136]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [13160502500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic characteristic parameters of mechanical joints are difficult to determine in theoretical modeling, dynamic simulation, and servo controller design for the ball screw feed drive system. Therefore, this study proposes a novel method for identifying the axial stiffness and damping parameters of the rolling joints in an assembled ball screw feed drive system. First, the proposed method deduces the axial vibration equations of the feed drive system with a harmonic excitation force exerted on its worktable. Second, the identification model of the axial stiffness and damping parameters of the rolling joints is established on the basis of the equations. Third, the identification equations are built by measuring the distance between the screw supporting points, the frequency, and the amplitude of the harmonic excitation force, as well as the amplitude of the axial vibration velocity of the screw end section. The axial stiffness and damping parameters of the rolling joints are finally determined by solving the identification equations using the genetic algorithm. With a ball screw feed drive system as the research object, the proposed method is used to identify the rolling joints' axial stiffness and damping parameters of the ball screw assembly, as well as the left and the right bearing groups. The experiments show that the proposed method is correct, effective, and achieves high identification accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据