4.6 Article

Diagnostic workup of patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome: a retrospective single-centre cohort study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 569-576

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02909.x

关键词

acquired; aortic valve stenosis; bleeding; diagnosis; paraprotein; von Willebrand factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) remains challenging. Diagnostic algorithms suggest the use of factor VIII (FVIII:C), von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), and collagen-binding capacity (VWF:CB), but the sensitivity of these and other laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AVWS is unknown. Objectives: To analyze the capacity of laboratory tests, including point-of-care testing (POCT), for the identification of patients with AVWS. Patients/methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients were enrolled with AVWS diagnosed because of a history of recent onset of bleeding, a negative family history of von Willebrand disease, and abnormal plasma VWF multimers. Results: According to our inclusion criteria, all patients had bleeding symptoms, and the VWF high molecular weight multimers were either decreased or absent. Regarding POCT, PFA-100 was inconclusive, due to anemia or thrombocytopenia, in 29%; the sensitivity was 80% in the remaining patients. The sensitivity of VWF:Ag (23%), VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 (26%), VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.7 (46%), anti-VWF antibodies (15%) and VWF propeptide/Ag ratio (22%) was too low to rule out the disease. A combination of VWF:Ag < 50 IU dL(-1), VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 and VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.8 yielded a sensitivity of 86%. Patients diagnosed only because of abnormal VWF multimers showed similar clinical characteristics as other patients. Conclusions: Early diagnosis of AVWS is difficult, due to lack of sensitivity of the tests used. A substantial number of patients present with normal or increased test results, emphasizing the importance of multimer analysis in all patients with suspected AVWS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据