4.6 Article

Compromised ITAM-based platelet receptor function in a patient with immune thrombocytopenic purpura

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 1175-1182

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03016.x

关键词

autoantibody; GPVI shedding; ITAM receptor; ITP; platelets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Receptors on platelets that contain immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) include collagen receptor glycoprotein (GP) VI, and Fc gamma RIIa, a low affinity receptor for immunoglobulin (Ig) G. Objectives: We examined the function of GPVI and Fc gamma RIIa in a patient diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who had unexplained pathological bruising despite normalization of the platelet count with treatment. Methods and Results: Patient platelets aggregated normally in response to ADP, arachadonic acid and epinephrine, but not to GPVI agonists, collagen or collagen-related peptide, or to Fc gamma RII-activating monoclonal antibody (mAb) 8.26, suggesting ITAM receptor dysfunction. Plasma contained an anti-GPVI antibody by MAIPA and aggregated normal platelets. Aggregating activity was partially (similar to 60%) blocked by Fc gamma RIIa-blocking antibody, IV.3, and completely blocked by soluble GPVI ectodomain. Full-length GPVI on the patient platelet surface was reduced to similar to 10% of normal levels, and a similar to 10-kDa GPVI cytoplasmic tail remnant and cleaved Fc gamma RIIa were detectable by western blot, indicating platelet receptor proteolysis. Plasma from the patient contained similar to 150 ng mL(-1) soluble GPVI by ELISA (normal plasma, similar to 15 ng mL(-1)) and IgG purified from patient plasma caused Fc gamma RIIa-mediated, EDTA-sensitive cleavage of both GPVI and Fc gamma RIIa on normal platelets. Conclusions: In ITP patients, platelet autoantibodies can curtail platelet receptor function. Platelet ITAM receptor dysfunction may contribute to the increased bleeding phenotype observed in some patients with ITP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据