4.6 Article

Effects of apoptosis and lipid peroxidation on T-lymphoblastoid phospholipid-dependent procoagulant activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 1122-1130

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02957.x

关键词

apoptosis; lipid peroxidation; phospholipid; procoagulant activity; T cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Coagulation has an absolute requirement for macromolecular complexes to be assembled on a negatively charged phospholipid (PL) surface. Previously, we reported that malignant T-lymphoblastoid cells have the ability to support procoagulant activity (PCA) independently of tissue factor by providing such a surface. Objective: To explore the effect of two pathophysiologic processes, apoptosis and lipid peroxidation (LP), on this PL-dependent PCA. Methods: Three different assays for PL-dependent PCA (factor IXa-initiated FXa and thrombin generation and prothrombinase activity) were used to investigate this PCA after exposing three T-lymphoblastoid cell lines to either apoptotic stimuli (1 mu M staurosporine) or oxidative stress (4 mM H(2)O(2) and 40 mu M CuSO(4)). Surface exposure of anionic PL was measured by flow cytometry using annexin A5(FITC) and an antibody (3G4) specific for native, but not oxidized, phosphatidylserine (PS). Results and Conclusions: Both apoptosis and LP significantly enhanced the PCA of cells, to a level that was greater than that observed following calcium ionophore treatment, suggesting that the increased activity was not solely due to anionic PL exposure. Whereas cells undergoing apoptosis bound both annexin A5(FITC) and 3G4, only annexin A5(FITC) bound to cells undergoing LP. This implies that apoptosis increases PCA by causing the translocation of oxidized/native PS to the outer membrane, whereas LP appears to increase the PCA, possibly due to malondialdehyde adducts altering the net charge on the cell surface, which allows PLs other than PS to participate in thrombin generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据