4.6 Article

The Oncofetal Protein IMP3: A Useful Marker to Predict Poor Clinical Outcome in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 1656-1661

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000316

关键词

IMP3; Lung neuroendocrine tumors; Nanog; Oct3/4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: We evaluated the expression of the oncofetal protein IMP3 in a series of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung, correlating our results with proliferating index Ki67 and with the expression of the two most studied stem cell markers in lung cancer, Nanog and Oct3/4. Methods: A total of 74 patients with a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor including 46 cases of typical carcinoid, nine cases of atypical carcinoids, 13 cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and six cases of small cell carcinomas were enrolled. Results: IMP3 was expressed in 50% of small cell carcinomas, 84% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 55% of atypical carcinoids and 10% of typical carcinoids. IMP3-positive cases showed significantly decreased overall and disease-free survival time compared with IMP3-negative cases. Nanog was expressed in 50% of small cell carcinomas, 31% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 33% of atypical carcinoids and 15% of typical carcinoids, and 68% of IMP3-positive tumors were also enriched for Nanog expression. Conversely, Oct3/4 expression could not be detected in all the analyzed series. When combining Ki67 and IMP3 expression we demonstrated that all the cases with a Ki67 index higher than 4% were also IMP3-positive, and their simultaneous expression was a poor prognostic factor. Conclusions: IMP3 is a marker of poor outcome in lung neuroendocrine tumors; its correlation with Nanog expression suggest an implication of IMP3 in stem cell processes and its association with a Ki67 labeling index higher than 4% stratifies a subset of atypical carcinoids with a higher risk of recurrence and mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据