4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed and Cisplatin, with Chest Radiotherapy Followed by Docetaxel in Patients with Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 927-933

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182156109

关键词

Pemetrexed; Concurrent therapy; NSCLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pemetrexed has emerged as one of the most active agents for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and feasibility of integrating pemetrexed in a concurrent therapy plan for patients with stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage III NSCLC with performance status 0 to 1, adequate organ function including pulmonary function, and V20 less than 40% were eligible. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (first five patients 60 mg/m(2)) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days for three cycles with chest radiotherapy to 66 Gy. Patients then received three cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. Tumors were analyzed for Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 and thymidylate synthase. Results: Patient characteristics (N = 28) were median age, 60; males, 68%; stage IIIB, 64%; and squamous cell, 43%. Twenty-four patients (86%) completed all three cycles of cisplatin/pemetrexed. Of the 24 patients eligible for docetaxel, 21 (87%) received it. Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (39%), febrile neutropenia (14%), esophagitis (14%), and pneumonitis (4%). Median survival was 34 months, and 1-year survival was 66%. Survival was not significantly different in squamous and other histology patients. Tumor analysis in 16 patients showed that moderate/strong expression of thymidylate synthase was significantly associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Integrating pemetrexed in a concurrent therapy regimen for patients with stage III NSCLC is feasible and was associated with a median survival of 34 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据