4.6 Article

Relationship between Tumor Size and Survival among Patients with Resection of Multiple Synchronous Lung Cancers

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 1018-1024

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181dd0fb0

关键词

Multiple lung cancers; Surgery; Survival; Tumor size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Multiple synchronous non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) without extrathoracic metastasis are relatively uncommon. Some patients are treated as metastatic disease by chemotherapy alone; others are treated as multiple primary cancers by surgery. For those undergoing surgery, limited information exists on the relationship between tumor size and survival. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with resection of at least two synchronous NSCLC located in >= 2 lobes during 1997-2008. Those with only satellite nodules in single lobe were excluded. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the prognostic significance of tumor size in the context of other clinical parameters including tumor stage, nodal stage, age, gender, laterality, histology, and pneumonectomy. Results: There were 116 patients: 57 patients had cancers distributed in one lung and 59 in both lung. Overall, 186 thoracotomies were performed, with a 90-day mortality rate of 2.6%. The median overall survival was 65.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.2-83.7). The median size of the largest tumor and the median sum of tumor sizes were 3.0 and 4.5 cm, respectively. Both were a significant predictor of survival: hazard ratios per centimeter increase where 1.17 (95% CI: 1.06-1.30, p = 0.003) and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05-1.26, p = 0.003), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis identified tumor size and lung function as independent survival predictors. Conclusion: Among patients with resected multiple synchronous NSCLC, tumor size is an independent predictor of survival. The size of the largest tumor performs slightly better than the sum of tumor sizes in the survival prediction; however, both are much better than the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage for this purpose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据