4.6 Article

Biodegradable elastic patch plasty ameliorates left ventricular adverse remodeling after ischemia-reperfusion injury: A preclinical study of a porous polyurethane material in a porcine model

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [HL069368]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to irreversible adverse left ventricular remodeling resulting in subsequent severe dysfunction. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential for biodegradable, elastomeric patch implantation to positively alter the remodeling process after MI in a porcine model. Methods: Yorkshire pigs underwent a 60-minute catheter balloon occlusion of the left circumflex artery. Two weeks after MI animals underwent epicardial placement of a biodegradable, porous polyurethane (poly(ester urethane) urea; PEUU) patch (MI+PEUU, n = 7) or sham surgery (MI+sham, n = 8). Echocardiography before surgery and at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery measured the end-diastolic area (EDA) and fractional area change (% FAC). All animals were humanely killed 8 weeks after surgery and hearts were histologically assessed. Results: At 8 weeks, echocardiography revealed greater EDA values in the MI+sham group (23.6 +/- 6.6 cm(2), mean +/- standard deviaation) than in the MI+PEUU group (15.9 +/- 2.5 cm(2)) (P < .05) and a lower %FAC in the MI+sham group (24.8 +/- 7.6) than in the MI+PEUU group (35.9 +/- 7.8) (P < .05). The infarcted ventricular wall was thicker in the MI_PEUU group (1.56 +/- 0.5 cm) than in the MI+sham group (0.91 +/- 0.24 cm) (P < .01). Conclusions: Biodegradable elastomeric PEUU patch implantation onto the porcine heart 2 weeks post-MI attenuated left ventricular adverse remodeling and functional deterioration and was accompanied by increased neovascularization. These findings, although limited to a 2-month follow-up, may suggest an attractive clinical option to moderate post-MI cardiac failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据