4.6 Article

Congenital heart surgery in infants: Effects of acute kidney injury on outcomes

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.021

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We sought to characterize factors and outcomes associated with postoperative acute kidney injury in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: We retrospectively studied 430 infants (< 90 days) who underwent heart surgery for congenital defects. With a pediatric modified version of the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification, we performed statistical analyses to detect factors and outcomes associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. Results: Postoperative acute kidney injury occurred in 225 patients (52%): 135 patients (31%) reached maximum acute kidney injury stage I, 59 (14%) reached stage II, and 31 (7%) reached stage III. On multivariable analysis, single-ventricle status (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.37; P = .02), cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.47; P = .04), and higher reference serum creatinine (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-13.2; P - .0009) were associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. Thirty-two (7%) patients died in the hospital. Multivariable logistic regression showed that more severe acute kidney injury was associated with in-hospital mortality (maximum acute kidney injury stage II odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-15.2; P = .004; maximum acute kidney injury stage III odds ratio, 9.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.91-30.7; P = .0002) and longer mechanical ventilation and inotropic support. All acute kidney injury stages were associated with longer intensive care durations. Stage III acute kidney injury was associated with systemic ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge. Conclusions: Perioperative acute kidney injury is common in infant heart surgery and portends a poor clinical outcome. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143:368-74)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据