4.6 Article

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detects a high prevalence of hypertension late after coarctation repair in patients with hypoplastic arches

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 144, 期 5, 页码 1110-1118

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine by 24-hour blood pressure monitoring the risk of hypertension late after coarctation repair in patients with arch hypoplasia. Methods: Sixty-two of 116 consecutive patients (age, >= 10 years) who had coarctation repair and were quoted subjectively by the surgeon or the cardiologist to have arch hypoplasia at the time of the repair underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. Median age at repair was 11 days (range, 6-48 days). Mean preoperative z score of the proximal transverse arch was -2.43 +/- 0.46. Eight patients had a repair via sternotomy (6 end-to-side anastomoses, 2 patch repairs) and 54 had a conventional repair via thoracotomy. Results: After a follow-up of 18 +/- 5 years, 27% of the patients (17/62) had resting hypertension and 60%(37/62) had abnormal ambulatory blood pressure. Sensitivity of high resting blood pressure in detecting an abnormal 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was 41%. Twenty patients had arch obstruction at last follow-up. Eighteen of them (90%) had abnormal ambulatory blood pressure. None of the patients operated on with end-to-side repair via sternotomy had reobstruction compared with 33% (18/54) of those repaired via thoracotomy. Conclusions: Patients with a hypoplastic arch operated via thoracotomy have an alarming prevalence of hypertension. Regular follow-up with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is warranted, especially in patients who have had a smaller aortic arch at the time of the initial operation. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:1110-8)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据