4.6 Article

Endobronchial ultrasound increases the diagnostic yields of polymerase chain reaction and smear for pulmonary tuberculosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 139, 期 6, 页码 1554-1560

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC 97-2314-B-182A-088-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Our objective was to determine the contribution of endobronchial ultrasound in the diagnostic yields of acid-fast bacillus smear, nucleic acid amplification tests, and culture in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: During a 1-year interval, 99 patients who had initial sputum-negative acid-fast bacillus smears or no sputum but were later proven to have a positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in their sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were retrospectively studied. Among them, 56 patients underwent bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS group) and 43 patients received conventional bronchoscopy for bronchoalveolar lavage (non-EBUS group). Results: The diagnostic yields of the nucleic acid amplification tests (89.3%, 50/56; P = .006), acid-fast bacillus smear (30.4%, 17/56; P - .013), and M tuberculosis culture in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (67.9%, 38/56; P = .041) were significantly higher in the EBUS group of patients. The results of those who underwent conventional bronchoscopy were 65.1% (28/43), 9.3% (4/43), and 46.5% (20/43), respectively. Combining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid smear and nucleic acid amplification tests, we made a rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in 51 (91.1%) of the 56 EBUS patients and 29 (67.4%; P = .004) of the 43 non-EBUS patients. Conclusions: The introduction of endobronchial ultrasound increases the diagnostic yield of the nucleic acid amplification tests, acid-fast bacillus smear, and M tuberculosis culture from bronchioalveolar lavage fluid in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who have negative sputum smear or no sputum production. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:1554-60)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据