4.6 Article

Pretreatment with ω-3 fatty acid infusion to prevent leukocyte-endothelial injury responses seen in cardiac surgery

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.010

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Inappropriate multiorgan endothelial-leukocyte activation is major causative factor in organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery. We investigated in vitro, mechanism and magnitude of attenuation of the pathogenic response through pretreatment with an omega-3 fatty acid infusion. Methods: Perioperative saphenous endothelial cell monolayers were pretreated and then stimulated with perioperative inflammatory mediators. Endothelial production of interleukin 6, interleukin 8, and adhesion molecules necessary for neutrophil tissue penetration, were examined, together with inflammatory endothelial coagulant responses. Pretreatment effects on isolated blood neutrophil inflammatory responses were similarly noted. Mechanistic insight was obtained through assessment of the temporal response of nuclear factor-kB and its association with heat shock protein 72(HSP72) expression. Results: Four-hour pretreatment markedly reduced inflammatory endothelial release of interleukin 8 (2587 +/- 82 pg/mL control vs 208 +/- 3 pg/mL omega-3 pretreated, P < .01) and endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (196.1 +/- 2.0 vs 71.9 +/- 0.6 mean channel fluorescence, P,.01) in response to endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor a. Neutrophil activation (CD11b and respiratory burst) was maintained, but pretreated neutrophils had shorter survival. Endothelial inflammatory stimulation produced rapid increase in nuclear activity of nuclear factor-kB, which was attenuated by 43% with omega-3 pretreatment (P < .01). This coincided with 3- fold increase (P= .03) in protective HSP72 expression with pretreatment. Conclusion: Acute pre-treatment with a clinically acceptable omega-3 infusion attenuates perioperative endothelial-neutrophil activation through transcription-level interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据