4.7 Article

Estimation of enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties in Brown soil by microcalorimetry

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 969-988

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-013-3588-z

关键词

Microcalorimetry; Enzymatic and biochemical properties; Organic amendments; Water levels; Brown soil

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863Program) [2012AA101402]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT1247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study was conducted with the objective to assess soil enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties by customary methods and results obtained by conventional methods, corroborated with microcalorimetry. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with ten treatments in triplicates. The RS and GM were used at three rates (0, 5, and 25 mg g(-1) soil, respectively). The soils were maintained at two water levels 25 % (W1) and 200 % (W2) of soil water-holding capacity. All soil enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties were measured by standard methods. The incorporation of GM and RS, especially at high rates and water levels, 25 % (W1) and 200 % (W2) significantly (p < 0.05) affected the soil enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties compared to controls. The microcalorimetric parameters P (max) and k were positively correlated, whereas t (max) negatively linked with the results of enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties at p < 0.01. Conversely, Q elucidated non-significant correlation (p < 0.05) to urease (0.248), neutral phosphatase (0.281), dehydrogenase (0.291), MBC (0.283), MBP (0.277), DOC (0.269), DON (0.190), SOM (0.284), and pH (0.047). Our results suggested that calorimetric parameters P (max), t (max), and k are highly sensitive and could be used as indices of soil enzymatic, microbial, and chemical properties, while Q is an indigent indicator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据