4.7 Article

Preparation and thermal properties of poly[acrylonitrile-co-(β-methylhydrogen itaconate)] used as carbon fiber precursor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 1037-1047

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-013-3534-0

关键词

Polyacrylonitrile; beta-Methylhydrogen; Itaconate; Solution polymerization; Stabilization; Carbon fiber; DSC

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20974018]
  2. Important National Research Program 863'' [2012AA030313-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to replace terpolymer with bipolymer, a bifunctional comonomer beta-methylhydrogen itaconate (MHI) containing carboxyl group and ester group was synthesized to prepare poly[acrylonitrile-co-(beta-methylhydrogen itaconate)] [P(AN-co-MHI)] bipolymers used as carbon fiber precursor for improving the stabilization and spinnability at the same time. The P(AN-co-MHI) bipolymers with different monomer feed ratios were characterized by elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results show that both the polymerization conversion and molecular mass of P(AN-co-MHI) reduce with the increasing MHI amounts in the feed due to the larger molecular volume of MHI than acrylonitrile (AN). The monomer reactivity ratios were calculated by Fineman-Ross and Kelen-Tuds methods, the results show good agreement and MHI possesses higher reactivity than AN. Two parameters and were defined to evaluate the extent of stabilization, and the activation energy (E (a)) of the cyclization was calculated by Kissinger method and Ozawa method. The FTIR, XRD, and DSC results show that P(AN-co-MHI) bipolymers exhibit significantly improved stabilization characteristics than PAN homopolymer, such as larger extent of stabilization, lower initiation temperature, and smaller E (a) of cyclization, which is attributed to the ionic initiation by MHI comonomer and it is beneficial to preparing high-performance carbon fiber.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据