4.7 Article

Effect of alkali treatment on mechanical and thermal properties of Kenaf fiber-reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 109, 期 3, 页码 1435-1443

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-012-2258-x

关键词

Thermoplastic polyurethane; Kenaf bast fibers; Alkali treatment; FTIR; TG; DSC

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia [01-10-10-924FR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a composite of thermoplastic polyurethane reinforced with short Kenaf fiber (Hibiscus cannabinus) was prepared via melt-blending method using Haake Polydrive R600 internal mixer. Effect of various sodium hydroxide NaOH concentrations, namely 2, 4 and 6% on tensile, flexural and impact strength was studied. Mean values were determined for each composite according to ASTM standards. Tensile, flexural and impact strength negatively correlates with higher concentrations of NaOH. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to examine the surface of both treated and untreated fibers as well as fracture surface of tensile specimens. Morphology of treated and untreated fibers showed a rougher surface of treated fibers. It also showed that some of high concentrations of NaOH treated fibers have NaOH residues on their surface. This was confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray point shooting performed on the same SEM machine. Morphology of surface of fracture indicated that untreated composite had a better adhesion. Treated and untreated fibers as well as composites were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). FTIR of treated fibers showed that NaOH treatment resulted in removal of hemicelluloses and lignin. FTIR also showed that untreated composite has more H-bonding than all treated composites. Thermal characteristic studies using thermogravimetry analysis and differential scanning calorimetry showed that untreated composite was more thermally stable than treated composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据