4.7 Article

Improvement of thermal decomposition properties of ammonium perchlorate particles using some polymer coating agents

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 721-730

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-012-2784-6

关键词

Ammonium perchlorate particles; Thermal decomposition; Polymer coating agents; Solvent/non-solvent; Heat of decomposition; Kinetic parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aimed to investigate the optimum conditions for modification of thermal decomposition properties of ammonium perchlorate (AP) particles through microencapsulation techniques. A solvent/non-solvent method has been used to perform microencapsulation of AP particles with some polymer-coating agents such as viton A and nitrocellulose (NC). Differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, and scanning electron microscopy have been exploited to investigate the thermal properties, heat of decomposition, and coating morphology of pure and coated samples. The preliminary results revealed that AP microparticle could be effectively coated with both NC and viton, but the latter significantly and unfavorably attenuated heat of decomposition of AP so NC was chosen as an appropriate coating agent for modification of thermal properties of AP. The thermal analysis of NC-coated samples, prepared at optimized coating conditions, showed that its first stage decomposition temperature increases about 12 A degrees C with respect to uncoated sample and reaches to 305 A degrees C. Also, the apparent activation energy (E), Delta G (not equal), Delta H (not equal), and Delta S (not equal) of the decomposition processes of the pure and coated AP particles at the optimum conditions were obtained by non-isothermal methods that proposed by ASTM and Ozawa. Finally, the results of this investigation showed that microencapsulation of AP particles with fibrous NC enhance its heat of decomposition (similar to 120 J g(-1)) with no obvious effect on kinetic parameters and thermal decomposition temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据