4.4 Article

Role of phytoplankton cell size on the competition for nutrients and light in incompletely mixed systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 330-343

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.044

关键词

Resource competition; Cell size; Cell stoichiometry; Spatially resolved model; Turbulent mixing

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SPP 1162, PE 701/2-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the effects of algal cell size on the competition for nutrients and light in an incompletely mixed water column, employing a spatially explicit variable internal stores approach and previously published allometric scaling relationships for modeling phytoplankton growth. We analyze the interplay between the size-dependent vertical assimilation and uptake profiles and the role of environmental settings such as mixing intensity, nutrient loading and background turbidity for the outcome of competition. Our results suggest that a potentially beneficial factor for resource competition in spatially heterogeneous systems is a low ratio of subsistence nutrient quota to the maximal quota, q(min)/q(max), which is a decreasing function of cell size according to allometric relationships. Environmental parameters such as mixing intensity and nutrient availability are shown to modulate the relevance of the q(min)/q(max) ratio for the competitive outcome and thereby have non-monotonic impacts on the algal size selection. The outcome of competition further depends on the temporal and spatial variability of mixing. In particular, the presence of a metalimnion with low diffusivity and periodic perturbation of the depth of the metalimnion strongly influences the relative success of differently sized algae. This suggests that the anticipated reduction in wind induced mixing events due to climate warming will have context-dependent consequences for algal size selection. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据