4.4 Article

Titin-induced force enhancement and force depression: A 'sticky-spring' mechanism in muscle contractions?

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 259, 期 2, 页码 350-360

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.015

关键词

Molecular mechanism; Model; Stretch; Shortening; Sarcomere; Myofilament interaction

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [S1841/2-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sliding filament and crossbridge theories do not suffice to explain a number of muscle experiments. For example, from the entire muscle to myofibrils, predictions of these theories were shown to underestimate the force output during and after active tissue stretch. The converse applies to active tissue shortening. In addition to the crossbridge cycle, we propose that another molecular mechanism is effective in sarcomere force generation. We suggest that, when due to activation, myosin binding sites are available on actin, the giant protein titin's PEVK region attaches itself to the actin filament at those sites. As a the molecular spring length is dramatically reduced. This leads to increased passive force when result, the sarcomere is stretched and to decreased or even negative passive force when the sarcomere shortens. Moreover, during shortening, the proposed mechanism interferes with active-force production by inhibiting crossbridges. Incorporation of a simple 'sticky-spring' mechanism model into a Hill-type model of sarcomere dynamics offers explanations for several force-enhancement and force-depression effects. For example, the increase of the sarcomere force compared to the force predicted solely by the sliding filament and crossbridge theories depends on the stretch amplitude and on the working range. The same applies to the decrease of sarcomere force during and after shortening. Using only literature data for its parameterization, the model predicts forces similar to experimental results. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据