4.4 Article

Optimising the success of random destructive searches: Levy walks can outperform ballistic motions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 260, 期 1, 页码 98-103

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.05.033

关键词

Levy walks; First passage time; Foraging

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education [MEC-EX2005-1011]
  3. DARPA [HR0011-05-1-0057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We re-evaluate the long standing and widely held belief that ballistic movements (i.e. straight-lines movements) outperform Levy walks when searching for targets that once located are not revisited. The belief stems from the results of analyses of one-dimensional searches, analyses which have not accounted for the fact that target numbers can be continually depleted during the search process. this is a crucial oversight because continual depletion promotes the searching efficiencies of some Levy walks above that of ballistic motion. the continual depletion effect is not so important for two- and three-dimensional searches. Nevertheless, we show that Levy walks and ballistic movements can be equally or almost equally effective when searching within two- and three-dimensional environments for randomly and sparsely distributed targets or when searching for targets that are occasionally concealed. We also show that Levy walks are advantageous when searching for targets that can occasionally evade capture. These situations represent common predator-prey interactions in which predators are involved in 'imperfect destructive' searches. Our model suggests that accounting for coevolutionary arms races at the predator-prey detection/reaction scales can explain to some extent Levy walk searching patterns of predators at larger scales. This result provides new insights into the Levy walk movement patterns of some destructive for agers. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据