4.4 Article

The first peptides: The evolutionary transition between prebiotic amino acids and early proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 261, 期 4, 页码 531-539

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.004

关键词

Origin of life; Prebiotic peptides; Protein ancestor; Peptide structure and function

资金

  1. Belgian State Science Policy Office through an Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (DYSCO)
  2. Fund for Scientific Research (FRS) through FRFC
  3. Bsik research grant BRICKS
  4. NWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The issues we attempt to tackle here are what the first peptides did look like when they emerged on the primitive earth, and what simple catalytic activities they fulfilled. We conjecture that the early functional peptides were short (3-8 amino acids long), were made of those amino acids, Gly, Ala, Val and Asp, that are abundantly produced in many prebiotic synthesis experiments and observed in meteorites, and that the neutralization of Asp's negative charge is achieved by metal ions. We further assume that some traces of these prebiotic peptides still exist, in the form of active sites in present-day proteins. Searching these proteins for prebiotic peptide candidates led us to identify three main classes of motifs, bound mainly to Mg2+ ions: D(F/Y)DGD corresponding to the active site in RNA polymerases, DGD(G/A)D present in some kinds of mutases, and DAKVGDGD in dihydroxyacetone kinase. All three motifs contain a DGD submotif, which is suggested to be the common ancestor of all active peptides. Moreover, all three manipulate phosphate groups, which was probably a very important biological function in the very first stages of life. The statistical significance of our results is supported by the frequency of these motifs in today's proteins, which is three times higher than expected by chance, with a P-value of 3 x 10(-2). The implications of our findings in the context of the appearance of life and the possibility of an experimental validation are discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据