3.9 Article

An architectural model for the bladderwort Utricularia gibba (Lentibulariaceae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 2, 页码 137-148

出版社

TORREY BOTANICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3159/TORREY-D-11-00088.1

关键词

Carnivorous plants; Everglades; morphology; Utricularia gibba

资金

  1. Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, Nongame Wildlife Grants Program [NG06-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CHORMANSKI, T. A. (Biology/Health & Wellness, Miami Dade College, 11011 SW 104th Street, Miami, FL 33176) and J. H. RICHARDS (Dept. of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199). J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 139: 137-148. 2012. Members of the aquatic plant genus Utricularia have extremely modified vegetative morphology, which includes absence of roots and lack of a clear distinction between leaves and stems. In this study, the vegetative morphology, anatomy and growth pattern of Utricularia gibba (L.), a common species in the southern Florida Everglades, was analyzed to determine general developmental patterns and establish a basic model for growth of this species. Specimens were collected from different habitats in southern Florida during both the wet and dry seasons. Light and scanning electron microscopy were used to quantify anatomical and morphological characteristics. Utricularia gibba has a shoot apical meristem that produces repeating developmental units, each of which consists of a stolon bearing dichotomously branched leaf-like structure that supports the traps. These structures may subtend one or more axillary buds that can grow out to form additional stolons or inflorescences. The inflorescence produces aerial flowers, but also forms a modified stolon at its base that is covered with unique glandular papillae. Re-iteration of this model through branching creates the floating and benthic mats found in this species. The basic model can be expanded to other species of section Utricularia but not to all species of the genus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据