4.6 Article

Enhanced electromechanical properties and phase transition temperatures in [001] textured Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 ternary ceramics

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 107, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4929688

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB632900]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [SQ2012BAJY3766]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Program for Innovation Research of Science in Harbin Institute of Technology [01508451]
  5. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramic and Fine Processing Tsinghua University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[001] oriented relaxor based ternary Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O-3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-PbTiO3 (PIN-PMN-PT) ceramics were fabricated by templated grain growth. The effects of BaTiO3 template amount on the [001] orientation degree, microstructure, and resulting changes in dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties of PIN-PMN-PT were investigated. A high [001] texture fraction of 93% was achieved in the PIN-PMN-PT ceramics at 5 vol. % BaTiO3 template. Giant electromechanical properties (d(33)* = 1555 pC/N, d(33) = 824 pC/N, and k(p) = 0.81) and high ferroelectric properties (E-c = 8.3 kV/cm and P-r = 31 mu C/cm(2)) were obtained from those highly textured ceramics, which are much superior to those of randomly oriented counterpart. Furthermore, the textured ternary ceramics exhibited remarkably improved phase transition temperatures (Tr-t = 120 degrees C and T-c = 203 degrees C) compared with previously reported binary PMN-PT textured ceramics. The domain structure was characterized by piezoelectric force microscopy, and domain contribution to the enhanced piezoelectric response in the textured PIN-PMN-PT ceramics was analyzed. The high-quality textured ternary ceramics are very promising for new-generation electromechanical devices with high performance and wide temperature usage range. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据