4.7 Article

A comparative study of the decolorization capacity of the solar -assisted Fenton process using ferrioxalate and Al, Fe-bentonite catalysts in a parabolic trough reactor

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.08.015

关键词

Solar assisted Fenton process; Clay catalyst; Parabolic trough concentrator; Reactive Red 120

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development [III43005, TR37004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the decolorization efficiency of Reactive Red 120 (RR120) synthetic solution using ferrioxalate (CuOFeB) and Al, Fe-bentonite (AIFeB) catalysts in the solar-assisted Fenton process was evaluated, as well as impact of H2O2 photolysis on the process efficiency.The photo-Fenton oxidation of dye has been investigated using a concentrating solar parabolic reactor with constant solar radiation of 550 W/m(2) and 950W/m(2) for spring and summer periods, respectively. Experimental data has proved that photolysis of hydrogen peroxide has an important role in the process of decolorization, achieving a decolorization efficiency over 80.78% at pH 7. Under the optimal reaction conditions, both catalysts showed a good stability in the processes with dye removal over 90%. The mineralization efficiency depends on the intensity of the solar radiation, wherein similar to 50% was achieved under the higher solar intensity. Comparing reaction rate it is important to note that the larger specific surface area of AIFeB (155.83 m(2)/g) makes him a superior catalyst and thus solar-assisted Fenton process with this catalyst fast and efficient. Based on the decolorization rate constants, the examined processes can be placed in the following order: AIFeB (950 W/m(2))> AIFeB (550 W/m(2)) > CuOFeB (950 W/m(2))> CuOFeB (550 W/m(2)). These findings are confirmed on real effluent, whereby a greater degree of decolorization (91.89%) and mineralization (43%) has been achieved with AIFeB catalyst compared to CuOFeB (30.09% and 15%) during the process. (C) 2018 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据