4.7 Article

Implementing classroom physical activity breaks: Associations with student physical activity and classroom behavior

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 67-72

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.006

关键词

Children; Exercise; Low-income; School health

资金

  1. California Endowment
  2. NIH [T32 HL79891]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To investigate the relation of classroom physical activity breaks to students' physical activity and classroom behavior. Methods. Six elementary-school districts in California implemented classroom physical activity interventions in 2013-2014. Students' (N = 1322) accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during school and teachers' (N = 397) reports of implementation and classroom behavior were assessed in 24 schools at two time points (both post-intervention). Mixed-effects models accounted for nested data. Results. Minutes/day of activity breaks was positively associated with students' MVPA (beta s = .07-.14; ps = .012-.016). Students in classrooms with activity breaks were more likely to obtain 30 min/day of MVPA during school (OR = 1.75; p = .002). Implementation was negatively associated with students having a lack of effort in class (beta=-.17; p=.042), and student MVPA was negatively associated with students being off task or inattentive in the classroom (beta = -.17; p=.042). Students provided with 3-4 physical activity opportunities (classroom breaks, recess, PE, dedicated PE teacher) had approximate to 5 more min/day of school MVPA than students with no opportunities (B = 1.53 min/opportunity; p = .002). Conclusions. Implementing classroom physical activity breaks can improve student physical activity during school and behavior in the classroom. Comprehensive school physical activity programs that include classroom-based activity are likely needed to meet the 30 min/day school physical activity guideline. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据